Question: Let = p2 , P p1 and + f2 . We use the semantics of rst-order logic without equality. Prove or refute the following formulas

Let = p2 , P p1 and + f2 . We use the semantics of rst-order logic without equality. Prove or refute the following formulas semantically. That means you must show that I(A) = T for all models I and assignments (without using a proof calculus) or to give some I, such that
I(A) = F. 1. P(X)
2. X.Y.=(+(X,Y),+(Y,X)) 3. X.(P(X)Y.P(Y))
 Let = p2 , P p1 and + f2 . We

Problem 9.3 (First-Order Semantics) Let = S, PEE and + E E. We use the semantics of first-order logic without equality. Prove or refute the following formulas semantically. That means you must show that I (A)=T for all models I and assignments (without using a proof calculus) or to give some 1, such that 1 (A) = F. 1. P(X) 2. VX.VY. = (+(X,Y),+(Y, X)) 3. 3X.(P(X) VY.P(Y))

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Databases Questions!