Question: Let's talk about internal validity. Remember how doing experiments basically handle most threats to internal validity. With quasi-experiments, things are a little less sunny. For
- Let's talk about internal validity. Remember how doing experiments basically handle most threats to internal validity. With quasi-experiments, things are a little less sunny. For this discussion board, I want you to:
- Design a quasi-experiment that tests your project's hypothesis
- Comment on how the internal validity of your study is threatened under this design
Hypothesis: Adults who experienced trauma during their childhood are more likely to have adverse mental health outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, or PTSD, compared to those who did not experience childhood trauma.
Remember, we have the following threats to internal validity:
- ambiguous temporal precedence
- third variable problem
- selection
- maturation
- attrition
- history
- instrumentation
- regression to the mean
You do not have to comment on all these threats. Sometimes, a quasi design handles many of the threats. But, be sure to at least cover two threats to validity in your discussion.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
