LLL Aman decided to cut back a tree on his property. The man borrowed his neighbor's chainsaw and, as an expression of gratitude, offered to also cut down a tree on her property. The man cut back his tree according to the chainsaw instructions, which stated that the chainsaw should not run continuously for more than five minutes at a time. The man then attempted to cut down the neighbor's tree, which took considerably longer due to the thickness of the tree trunk. At one point, the man ran the chainsaw for seven minutes in a row, causing the motor on the chainsaw to overheat and break. The man returned the broken chainsaw to the neighbor. When the neighbor demanded that he pay for a new one, the man refused. If the neighbor files a negligence action against the man, will the neighbor likely prevail? () A._ No, because the man used the chainsaw for the neighbor's benefit. (a) B. No, because the man used the chainsaw in a reasonable manner when he cut back his own tree. f) C. Yes, because the man failed to use reasonable care when cutting down his neighbor's tree. (2) D. Yes, because the man owed the neighbor a duty of extraordinary care and breached that duty while cutting both trees