Lois is bitter$-$bitter because she failed in her audition to Garry, who is three years younger than application to attend Stamford was denied; bitter because de was in high school; bitter because she Lois, did not ask her to be his prom date any of the sin brothers during her entire childhood; bitter had to share a bathroom with her three sisters an because Rogen & Meadows $r.$ inage" $-$ she is just bitter. Her counges those who still speak to her$)$ know if; her five cats and three dogs know it; and, hell, even Lois knows it$.$ In her certainly internal, sometimes external, ayd seemingly eternal bitterness, Lois creates a website where she posts threatening messages about fill those "underlings" who have "wronged her" and are, therefore, "responsible" for her bitterness. Under the First Amendment, what Lois posts on her website is most likely protected:

If what Lois posts on her website proves to be unsubstantiated, meaning it cannot be verified that Lois intended to act on what she posted on her website. So long as what Lois posts on her website is not "obscene," meaning what she posts on her website is protected even if it is "offensive."

Only if there is one or more accompanying advertisements promoting one or more commercial transactions because Lois has wider latitude if she is engaged in commercial speech.

None of the time.

All of the time, because under the First Amendment's Freedom of Speech, Lois has the right to express herself, meaning she can state anything that to a reasonable person would convey a message.