Look at another First Amendment case provided in your book: Texas v. Johnson on page 167. Additional background on this case is available here: Texas v. JohnsonLinks to an external site. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether an action can be covered by the First Amendment even though the language of the amendment literally refers only to "speech," and the expression in this case case was "symbolic." This is an example of the Court interpreting the meaning of ambiguous language in the Constitution. What did the State of Texas argue? What did the Supreme Court decide? List at least two rules or ideas related to the First Amendment that you see the Court applying or explaining in this opinion. You may reference the majority opinion, the concurrence, or the dissent. Do you agree with outcome? Why or why not