Question: Lori, Inc., is using a costs-of-quality approach to evaluate design engineering efforts for a new skateboard. Christi's senior managers expect the engineering work to reduce
| Lori, Inc., is using a costs-of-quality approach to evaluate design engineering efforts for a new skateboard. Christi's senior managers expect the engineering work to reduce appraisal, internal failure, and external failure activities. The predicted reductions in activities over the 2-year life of the skateboards follow. Also shown are the cost allocation rates for each activity. | ||||||||||||
| Activity | Predicted Reduction in Activity Units | Activity Cost Allocation Rate Per Unit | ||||||||||
| Inspection of incoming materials | 415 | $45 | ||||||||||
| Inspection of finished goods | 415 | 19 | ||||||||||
| Number of defective units discovered in-house | 1,100 | 50 | ||||||||||
| Number of defective units discovered by customers | 375 | 70 | ||||||||||
| Lost sales to dissatisfied customers | 150 | 106 | ||||||||||
| 1. Calculate the predicted quality cost savings from the design engineering work.
| ||||||||||||
| 2. Lori spent $101,000 on design engineering for the new skateboard. What is the net benefit of this "preventive" quality activity?
| ||||||||||||
| 3. What major difficulty would Lori's managers have in implementing this cost-of-quality approach? What alternative approach could they use to measure quality improvement? | ||||||||||||
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
