Managerial Ethics: A Hazardous Debate

Return to Activi

Good!

I understand the Board's frustrations, but still believe we need to be cautious.

Maddie Epp, can we move ahead now that we know it is legal?

No$,$ let's consider if our shareholders would see value in the switch.

Yes, let's move ahead with the switch permanently.

No$,$ let's consider if it would be ethical.

Yes, but only for $6$ months while we wait on the EPA.

MSDS

Items

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Section $1-$ Product Information

Product Name

Product Code

Product Use

Section $2-$ Hazards

Explosive

Reactivity

Boiling Point

Ingestion

Skin Absorption

Inhalation

Health Hazard

Section $3-$ Legality

Environmental Protection Agency Certification

Food & Drug Administration Certification

Anticipated Certification Date

Adascotrol

ADSCO

Paper production lines

Yes

Stable

$212$ degrees $($F$)$

Nontoxic

Unknown

No irritation

Unknown

Not determined

Not determined

Unknown

connect

Materials

Score

lanagerial Ethics: A Hazardous Debate

Jackie

From a scientific standpoint, it isn't just about the possible savings. If Adascotrol is found to be problematic for the community, we could be poisoning our employees and community!

Susan

on't do it$,$ but tell the shareholders why you idn't.

pon't make the change until hearing back rom EPA.

Permanently stick with Licodral

Do it$,$ no need to disclose anything.

Submit

Waiting Period Savings vs$.$ Adascotrol Being Illegal $($B$)$ Quarter$)$

oswings

Adosected tingal

$$46259450$

$sin252450$

$2$

solyate

Qunter?

Qurter $3$

$\backslash$table$[[$Qurtei $4],[$st$4625350)]]$