Match	Case Name			Case Description
	Khan v Miah [2000] 1 WLR 2123		A	Held to be partners as the setting up of the business before it was operating was deemed to be part of the running of the business.
	Degiorgio v Dunn [2004] NSWSC 767		B	Court held parties were not partners as they were not carrying on a business 'in common'.
	Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353		C	It was held that an agreement must be in its final form for a contract to be enforceable.
	Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571		D	An agreement between a husband and wife was not a contract, merely an ordinary domestic arrangement. They had not intended to create legal relations.
	Cole v Pinnel [1602] 5 Co. Rep 117a		E	A lesser amount of money cannot satisfy full payment of a debt, however, a payment of a debt in a form, (such as a hawk or a robe) or at a time more convenient to the creditor, is good consideration, and may discharge the debt in full.
	Krell v Henry [1903] 3 KB 740		F	A contract may be frustrated by its impossibility to be completed due to the non-occurrence of an event basic to the contract.
	Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562		G	A duty of care is owed by one person to another, and is based on the relationship between them.
	Shaddock & Associates v Parramatta City Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225		H	The court held that a duty of care can arise in relation to the giving of advice or information in the context of a business setting.
	Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447		I	The court held it may set aside a contract between parties when one party has behaved unconscionably, by abusing the imbalance of power in the relationship of the parties.
	Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85		J	The case which the Privy Council upheld the principles of Donoghue and Stevenson and brought the tort of Negligence into Australia.