Match the case to its main purpose$/$issue$.$

United States$$v$.$Forbes

Tommie Lee Andrews

U$.$S$.$ vs$.$ Jacobetz

People v$.$ Crispi

State of Florida v$.$ Ramirez

State vs Green

A$.$ First DNA admissibility in US

B$.$ Focus was on controlled substance analogs

C$.$ Admissibility of firearms evidence not an issue, however, restrictions placed on how examiner testifies and states conclusions

D$.$ Lawyer used demonstration to show the jury the process of comparison between latent and known prints

E$.$ Highlighted the balancing test and judge's discretion

F$.$ Created concern over absolute certainty of firearm evidence comparison