Matthew is defending his Master's thesis - a correlational study where he looked at the relationship between time spent playing video games and verbal fluency test scores in a sample of fifty 7th graders. He found a negative correlation between logged video game hours and verbal fluency test scores. He ends thesis defense with, "Based on the results of my study, I conclude that playing video games causes a decline in verbal fluency among 7th grade students." Matthew has made a mistake! Which of the following is the most likely criticism a committee member in the audience might make? Question 24 options: "If you wanted to draw stronger conclusions, you should have conducted a case study - followed one student throughout their 7th grade year to see if playing more video games changed their English class grade at all." "It is not clear from the results of your correlational study that video game playing causes a decline in verbal fluency scores. You cannot infer causation from a correlational study! There may be a third unmeasured variable that is responsible for the relationship or the relationship might go in the reverse direction." "It's possible that your sample size was way too