Max E$.$ Pass, Jr$.,$ and his wife, Martha NF$.$ Pass, departed in an aircraft owned and operated by Mr$.$ Pass from Plant City, Florida, bound for Clarksville, Tennessee. Somewhere over Alabama the couple encountered turbulence, and Mr$.$ Pass lost control of the aircraft. The plane crashed, killing both Mr$.$ and Mrs$.$ Pass. Approximately four and a half months prior to the flight in which he was killed, Mr$.$ Pass had taken his airplane to Shelby Aviation, an aircraft service company, for inspection and service. In servicing the aircraft, Shelby Aviation replaced both rear wing attach point brackets on the plane. Three and one half years after the crash, Max E$.$ Pass, Sr$.,$ father of Mr$.$ Pass and administrator of his estate, and Shirley Williams, mother of Mrs$.$ Pass and administratrix of her estate, filed suit against Shelby Aviation. The lawsuit alleged that the rear wing attach point brackets sold and installed by Shelby Aviation were defective because they lacked the bolts necessary to secure them properly to the airplane. The plaintiffs asserted claims against the defendant for breach of express and implied warranties under Article $2$ of the Uniform Commercial Code $($UCC$),$ which governs the sale of goods. Shelby Aviation contended that the transaction with Mr$.$ Pass had been primarily for the sale of services, rather than of goods, and that consequently Article $2$ of the UCC did not cover the transaction. Does the UCC apply to this transaction? Explain.