May you please explain what does supervisor mean here.. Good morning Madam.

Assessment of Research Methodology Based on Specified Criteria

$1.$ Appropriateness of the Research Design

$$ Objective Alignment: The proposal presents a quantitative and qualitative approach to explore the impact of the Triple Constraint on project risk management. This mixed$-$methods design is well$-$aligned with the complex nature of the study's objectives, which require an in$-$depth exploration of interconnected project management elements. The qualitative component is particularly critical for understanding the nuances of how scope, cost, and time interact within the project management context.

$$ Design Rigor: The design incorporates a variety of research methods, including case studies and ethnography, which are appropriate for the comprehensive examination of the topic. However, the proposal could strengthen its design by explicitly incorporating methodological triangulation to enhance the validity of the findings, such as using both primary data $($interviews$,$ focus groups$)$ and secondary data $($document analysis$).$ If time is a factor, simply focus on using secondary data.

$2.$ Sampling Methodology

$$ Representativeness: The sampling methodology employs purposive sampling to select participants who are experienced project managers, which ensures that the sample is appropriate for the research objectives. However, the representativeness of this sample to the broader population of project managers could be questioned, as purposive sampling does not necessarily yield a sample that is statistically representative of the entire population.

$$ Sample Size: The proposal does not specify the exact number of participants, which makes it difficult to assess whether the sample size is adequate to achieve data saturation, especially for qualitative research. More details on how the sample size was determined and how saturation will be assessed would improve the methodology.

$3.$ Data Collection Methods

$$ Relevance and Validity: The data collection methods, including semi$-$structured interviews and focus groups, are highly relevant and effective for capturing in$-$depth data on the experiences and perceptions of project managers. These methods are valid for exploring complex interactions within project management.

$$ Reliability: The use of semi$-$structured interviews allows for flexibility in exploring the research questions, but the reliability of this method could be enhanced by detailing the steps taken to ensure consistency across interviews, such as using a standardized set of questions or employing multiple researchers to conduct the interviews.

$4.$ Data Analysis Techniques

$$ Suitability: The proposal indicates the use of thematic analysis for qualitative data, which is suitable for identifying patterns and themes related to project management risks. This method is appropriate given the nature of the data and the research questions.

$$ Analytical Rigor: The proposal could improve by detailing how data analysis will address potential biases and confounding variables. For example, outlining procedures for coding consistency, the use of intercoder reliability measures, or the involvement of multiple analysts would strengthen the analytical rigor.

$5.$ Ethical Considerations

$$ Informed Consent: The proposal mentions informed consent, which is crucial for ethical compliance. It would be beneficial to provide more detail about how informed consent will be obtained and what information will be provided to participants.

$$ Confidentiality and Anonymity: The proposal needs to specify the measures that will be taken to protect participant confidentiality and anonymity, such as data encryption, anonymized data storage, and the handling of sensitive information.

$$ Potential Harm and Benefit: The proposal should include a more detailed discussion of how potential risks to participants will be minimized and managed, and how the benefits of the research will outweigh these risks.

Conclusion

Overall, the research methodology outlined in the proposal provides a solid foundation for exploring the impact of the Triple Constraint on project risk management. Enhancements in methodological triangulation, sampling representativeness, detailed ethical considerations, and analytical rigor could further strengthen the study's design and execution.

At this stage you can complete your data collection and analysis.