Question: Module 1 4 1 4 . 1 . Discuss attribute semantics as an informal measure of goodness for a relation schema. 1 4 . 2
Module
Discuss attribute semantics as an informal measure of goodness for a relation schema.
Discuss insertion, deletion, and modification anomalies. Why are they considered bad? Illustrate with examples.
Why should NULLs in a relation be avoided as much as possible? Discuss the problem of spurious tuples and how we may prevent it
State the informal guidelines for relation schema design that we discussed. Illustrate how violation of these guidelines may be harmful.
What is a functional dependency? What are the possible sources of the information that defines the functional dependencies that hold among the attributes of a relation schema?
Why can we not infer a functional dependency automatically from a particular relation state?
What does the term unnormalized relation refer to How did the normal forms develop historically from first normal form up to BoyceCodd normal form?
Define first, second, and third normal forms when only primary keys are considered. How do the general definitions of NF and NF which consider all keys of a relation, differ from those that consider only primary keys?
What undesirable dependencies are avoided when a relation is in NF
What undesirable dependencies are avoided when a relation is in NF
In what way do the generalized definitions of NF and NF extend the definitions beyond primary keys?
Define BoyceCodd normal form. How does it differ from NF Why is it considered a stronger form of NF
What is multivalued dependency? When does it arise?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
