Module C Assignment

Read the following facts and using your knowledge of contract law, based on chapters $13,14,$&$15,$ answer the questions below:

embryos $($meaning she wants to become pregnant$).$ Boy does not want to be a father.

desire not to procreate. What's unique about this case from previous ones is that the couple here were never married $($is that an important fact, why or why not?$).$

sole custody of the embryos and won. Szafranski appealed the case.

to the questions so do not limit yourself to four pages if your response requires more page to fully address the questions.

Use no other resource to answer the questions, other than the facts as stated and the content of the applicable chapters, using any other resources will result in a grade of zero.$*$

before you submit the assignment to me for a grade.

Do not include the course name, my name, the date, the module name or the name of the assignment as all that does is waste space.

Did a contract exist between Dunston and Szafranski? If there was a contract, what type was it and why?

Did the May $2010$ "break up text" have any effect on the signed fertility clinic consent form, why or why not?

Discuss the elements of contract law that apply to this case, with detailed explanations of each, and present an argument, based on the law of contracts, regarding who should win this case.

Your responses must be posted on the Assignment page.