Question: Most statically typed languages developed since the 1970s (including Java, C#, and the descendants of Pascal) use some form of name equivalence for types. Is
Most statically typed languages developed since the 1970s (including Java, C#, and the descendants of Pascal) use some form of name equivalence for types. Is structural equivalence a bad idea? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
