Moving to another question will save this response.

Question $3$

In Ben v$.$ City Car Dealership, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in the same state is deciding Daphne $V.$ Ev Steven Auto Deals, Inc., a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to

a$.$ disregard the Ben case.

b$.$ require the minor in the Daphne case to fulfill the contract.

c$.$ follow the Ben case and permit the minor the Daphne case to cancel the contract.

d$.$ order the minor in the Daphne case to cancel the contract.