Moving to the next question prevents changes to this answer. Question 3 of 20 estion 3 5 points Save Answer What did the court rule in the case in which Holiday Inn claimed that by using a similar number a travel agency infringed Holiday Inns' trademark in its vanity toll free telephone number? That there was no potential for confusion and that, therefore, there was no trademark violation That there was a trademark violation and that damages were available. That although there was a potential for confusion, there was no trademark violation That there was a trademark violation but that only injunctive relief was available. Question 3 of 20 Moving to the next question prevents changes to this