Mr I. M. A. Star is the sole equity holder and manager of Stellar Company (SC)....
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Mr I. M. A. Star is the sole equity holder and manager of Stellar Company (SC). Today (t = 0) SC has assets in place that will generate a final cash flow of either £100 million or £0 in one year's time (at t = 1) with equal probability. There are no other cash flows from existing assets. Mr Star has very recently won the lottery and has a lot of money in the bank (tens of millions) and is thus planning to close down SC in a year's time after these cash flows are obtained. There are no other cash flows, no taxes of any kind, and the discount rate for all cash flows is 0. SC has pre-existing debt on its balance sheet (a discount bond) which matures at t = 1 with a face value of £12 million. Assume that at t = 0 it is not possible to renegotiate SC's debt in any way and any new debt issued must be junior to existing debt. At t = 0, SC has access to a new riskless project (Project 1) that costs £10 million to implement today and pays £15 million at t = 1. Clearly, having won the lottery, Mr Star has the personal resources to invest in this project if it is in his personal interest to do so. (a) (6 marks) Would Mr Star choose to contribute £10 million of his own resources to finance Project 1? Would his willingness to contribute have been different if (counterfactually) SC had no debt on its balance sheet? Show your work and explain your reasoning. (b) (5 marks) Suppose that SC instead had access to a different riskless project: Project 2. Project 2 also costs £10 million to implement at t = 0 but pays a higher amount of £18 million at t = 1. Given the debt on SC's balance sheet, would Mr Star be willing to finance Project 2 from his own resources? Show your work and interpret your finding in the context of part (a). (c) (6 marks) Suppose, counterfactually, that SC owed £18 million to its creditors at t = 1 (instead of £12 million). Would Mr Star's willingness to finance Project 1 or Project 2 differ from parts (a) and (b)? Show your work and interpret your findings. (d) (8 marks) While times are now rosy for Mr Star, they were not always so. Indeed, SC's current debt of £12 million was taken on a year ago (at t = -1) when SC was in dire straits and needed to raise as much liquidity as it could by borrowing. At t = -1, Mr Star and SC's potential creditors all knew that SC would have t = 1 cash flows (as described above) in two years. They also knew that SC would have access at t = 0 to either Project 1 or Project 2 (each as described above), but did not know which project would become available: At t = -1, everybody believed that at t = 0 SC would have access to Project 1 with probability p and to Project 2 with probability 1 - p. SC had two options for borrowing at t = -1: To sell a two-year discount bond with a face value of £12 million or to sell a two-year discount bond with a face value of £18 million. Under the guidance of Mr Star, SC chose to take on debt with a face value of only £12 million, despite its dire need for cash. Following his lottery win, Mr Star recently gave an interview to his university alumni magazine. Interestingly, when asked during this interview why he chose the lower level of debt at t = -1 (amongst the two choices available to him), Mr Star said mysteriously: "Upon reflection, I realized that issuing higher face value debt would raise less money." Can you shed light upon Mr Star's puzzling comment? What does Mr Star's choice say about the relative probabilities assigned by Mr Star and SC's creditors at t = -1 about the prospects of SC having access Project 1 vs Project 2 at t = 0? What general lessons can be learned from this specific example? Discuss. Mr I. M. A. Star is the sole equity holder and manager of Stellar Company (SC). Today (t = 0) SC has assets in place that will generate a final cash flow of either £100 million or £0 in one year's time (at t = 1) with equal probability. There are no other cash flows from existing assets. Mr Star has very recently won the lottery and has a lot of money in the bank (tens of millions) and is thus planning to close down SC in a year's time after these cash flows are obtained. There are no other cash flows, no taxes of any kind, and the discount rate for all cash flows is 0. SC has pre-existing debt on its balance sheet (a discount bond) which matures at t = 1 with a face value of £12 million. Assume that at t = 0 it is not possible to renegotiate SC's debt in any way and any new debt issued must be junior to existing debt. At t = 0, SC has access to a new riskless project (Project 1) that costs £10 million to implement today and pays £15 million at t = 1. Clearly, having won the lottery, Mr Star has the personal resources to invest in this project if it is in his personal interest to do so. (a) (6 marks) Would Mr Star choose to contribute £10 million of his own resources to finance Project 1? Would his willingness to contribute have been different if (counterfactually) SC had no debt on its balance sheet? Show your work and explain your reasoning. (b) (5 marks) Suppose that SC instead had access to a different riskless project: Project 2. Project 2 also costs £10 million to implement at t = 0 but pays a higher amount of £18 million at t = 1. Given the debt on SC's balance sheet, would Mr Star be willing to finance Project 2 from his own resources? Show your work and interpret your finding in the context of part (a). (c) (6 marks) Suppose, counterfactually, that SC owed £18 million to its creditors at t = 1 (instead of £12 million). Would Mr Star's willingness to finance Project 1 or Project 2 differ from parts (a) and (b)? Show your work and interpret your findings. (d) (8 marks) While times are now rosy for Mr Star, they were not always so. Indeed, SC's current debt of £12 million was taken on a year ago (at t = -1) when SC was in dire straits and needed to raise as much liquidity as it could by borrowing. At t = -1, Mr Star and SC's potential creditors all knew that SC would have t = 1 cash flows (as described above) in two years. They also knew that SC would have access at t = 0 to either Project 1 or Project 2 (each as described above), but did not know which project would become available: At t = -1, everybody believed that at t = 0 SC would have access to Project 1 with probability p and to Project 2 with probability 1 - p. SC had two options for borrowing at t = -1: To sell a two-year discount bond with a face value of £12 million or to sell a two-year discount bond with a face value of £18 million. Under the guidance of Mr Star, SC chose to take on debt with a face value of only £12 million, despite its dire need for cash. Following his lottery win, Mr Star recently gave an interview to his university alumni magazine. Interestingly, when asked during this interview why he chose the lower level of debt at t = -1 (amongst the two choices available to him), Mr Star said mysteriously: "Upon reflection, I realized that issuing higher face value debt would raise less money." Can you shed light upon Mr Star's puzzling comment? What does Mr Star's choice say about the relative probabilities assigned by Mr Star and SC's creditors at t = -1 about the prospects of SC having access Project 1 vs Project 2 at t = 0? What general lessons can be learned from this specific example? Discuss.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
a To determine whether Mr Star would choose to contribute 10 million of his own resources to finance Project 1 we need to compare the present value of ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Financial Accounting and Reporting a Global Perspective
ISBN: 978-1408076866
4th edition
Authors: Michel Lebas, Herve Stolowy, Yuan Ding
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these finance questions
-
Ques 1: What is the major complaint by firms concerning the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2012? A. the legislative maximum allowable compensation for a CEO. B. the legal requirement to disclose project...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Multiple Choice: Select the best answer and place it on the line next to the question number. ____ 1. Bond X and Bond Y are both issued by the same company. Each of the bonds has a maturity value of...
-
On 31 March 1980, Philip acquired a 48-year copyright at a cost of 85,000. The copyright was valued at 92,000 on 31 March 1982. On 31 March 2021, Philip sold the copyright for 47,000. Compute the...
-
A rigid tank contains 1 lb mol of argon gas at 400 R and 750 psia. A valve is now opened, and 3 lb mol of N2 gas is allowed to enter the tank at 340 R and 1200 psia. The final mixture temperature is...
-
Jensen Company invented a new process for manufacturing ice cream. The ingredients are mixed in high-tech machinery that forms the product into small round beads. Like a bag of balls, the ice cream...
-
Why is a distinction made between conventional accounting and ecological accounting?
-
Income is to be evaluated under four different situations as follows: a. Prices are rising: (1) Situation A: FIFO is used. (2) Situation B: LIFO is used. b. Prices are falling: (1) Situation C: FIFO...
-
You are looking at to invest $100,000 for the 12 years. You have already identified two possible mutual funds: Fund A- .09% front-end load and an expected 13% return Fund B- .03% front-end load and...
-
The Architect total contract fee for the project is: $235,000. The Basic Services will be performed in four phases as described below. The services shall be rendered in the following phases:...
-
Byzantium Bakery is located on State Street in Yore Town, Pennsylvania. It is a small operation known for its opulently crusty loaves. The owner, Leo Constantius, makes a practice of hiring interns...
-
Explain how government intervention in markets might not improve market outcomes.
-
Is it possible for a firm or firms operating in a natural monopoly to be subject to contestability? Explain.
-
How would an extension of property rights help reduce the instances of market failure?
-
Use an example to explain the idea of a positional externality. Example Positional Externalities Positional goods have the characteristic that the utility from consumption of a good is dependent on...
-
In a perfectly contestable market, inefficiency does not exist. Explain why.
-
FIFA brand's reputation suffered in Qatar. Discuss why the macro environmental analysis must be part of a due diligence study done before awarding the rights to host future FIFA world cup events.
-
Funds are separate fiscal and accounting entities, each with its own self-balancing set of accounts. The newly established Society for Ethical Teachings maintains two funds-a general fund for...
-
Multiple Choice Questions Select the right answer (only one possible answers unless otherwise stated). 1 The statement of financial position/balance sheet emphasizes the dynamics of the cash flowing...
-
aWhat sources of information on a business economic situation, other than financial statements, are available to the general public?
-
Multiple Choice Questions 1. Which of the following statements is not correct? (a) A ratio reflects a business model relationship between two or more variables. (b) When using comparative ratio...
-
Typical accounting specialists with designations include all of the following except: a. Certified Financial Analyst (CFA) b. Certified Public Accountant (CPA) c. Certified Bookkeeper (CB) d....
-
The Financial Accounting Standards Board is the: a. Governmental group that sets financial accounting principles. b. International group that identifies preferred international accounting principles....
-
Generally accepted accounting principles do not aim to make information in financial statements: a. Reasonable b. Relevant c. Reliable d. Comparable
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App