Question: Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether that is one answer or more. A skier is riding the lift at Deer Valley.

 Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether thatis one answer or more. A skier is riding the lift atDeer Valley. It is the skier's responsibility to pull the safety bar

Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether that is one answer or more. A skier is riding the lift at Deer Valley. It is the skier's responsibility to pull the safety bar up before exiting. The skier forgets to pull the safety bar up when exiting the lift. The lift attendant is required to stop the ski lift if someone forgets. However, the attendant is on a personal phone call and does not stop the lift. The skier falls and breaks his leg. The skier sues Deer Valley for Negligence. Deer Valley claims that the skier's own negligence caused his own harm. The jury finds that both parties were negligent. Which of the following statements is/are true: Under the Contributory Negligence Theory, if the jury finds that the skier was 10% negligent and Deer Valley was 90% negligent, the skier will recover 90% of his damages from Deer Valley. Under the Comparative Negligence, Modified Theory, if the jury finds that Deer Valley was 49% negligent, the skier cannot recover anything from the Defendant. Under the Comparative Negligence, Pure Theory, if the jury finds the skier was 60% negligent, Deer Valley will pay 40% of the skier's damages. Joseph sends an offer to Michael Jordan to purchase a pair of his shoes, stating that the offer is open for 10 days. Michael receives the offer on Day 1. Michael sends a rejection on Day 2, which does not get to Joseph until Day 6. Michael then softens his heart and decides he will let Joseph buy his shoes and sends an acceptance on Day 3 by overnight mail that is received on Day 4 . Which of the following statements is true: This is a valid contract as of Day 3 based on Michac's acceptance. This is not a valid contract as Michael rejected the offer effective Day 2. This is not a valid contract as Michael rejected the offer effective Day 6. This is a valid contract as of Day 4 based on Michael's acceptance. Multiple Answer Options: Select all answers that are correct, whether that is one answer or more. Cian attends a house party to celebrate graduation. While at the party, Cian carelessly throws an excessive amount of lighter fluid on the fire-pit, causing a low-hanging tree to catch on fire. The fire quicky spreads to the neighbor's house, who has improperly stored fireworks. The fireworks explode, leading to a fire in a large portion of the neighborhood. Jim, a neighbor that lives four-blocks away, has property damage as a result of the fire. If Jim sues Cian, which of the following statements is true: Cian is liable for Jim's property damage, as Cian's actions were careless. Cian is liable as he has a duty to not actively harm Jim. Cian is liable as his actions directly led to Jim's harm. Cian is not liable for Jim's property damage

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!