Multiple Choice Questions: Highlight or underline your answer to each question. (1 point each) 1. A state statute providing that persons who provide emergency services to someone in peril cannot be sued for negligence is known as a Statute of limitations "Danger Invites Rescue doctrine Strict liability statute Negligence Per Se rule Good Samaritan statute 2. Fred, who was jogging along the sidewalk, was distracted as a fabulous Lamborghini sports car drove by. Because of this distraction, Fred carelessly bumped into Cora Cora stumbled off the sidewalk onto the grass, but she was not injured in any way. If Cora sues Fred for negligence, which of the following is correct? Hint: Consider whether all of the elements for negligence have been met. a b. C Fred is liable to Cora for negligence because he failed to exercise reasonable care while jogging down the sidewalk Cora can sue Fred under the doctrine of strict liability, regardless of whether he was negligent, Both Fred and the driver of the Lamborghini are liable to Cora for negligence because both of them contributed to the chain of events that caused the accident All of the above None of the above. d. e