Need help with this please.

Learners are required to use appropriate analytical frameworks $($Critical Thinking Framework and Root Cause Analysis$)$ taught in the module to analyze the BCRM plans and emergency responses of the relevant parties involved in the Itaewon Disaster in $2022($see Appendix A$).$ The lectures on emergency response and coordination with external agencies will be especially relevant.

Learners are to discuss the fundamental reasons for the success$/$failures of the plans and$$

responses. They must offer recommendations to improve the plans and responses to prevent and manage a similar incident in the future.

CASE STUDY $(29$ Oct $2022)$

SEOUL $-$ At least $153$ people were killed in a crush when a huge crowd celebrating Halloween surged into an alley in a nightlife area of the South Korean capital Seoul on Saturday night, emergency officials said. Most of those who died were said to be teenagers and people in their $20$s$.$ Authorities said $22$ foreigners were killed, including those from Iran, Uzbekistan, China and Norway.

At least a further $133$ people were injured in the melee in Seoul$$s Itaewon district, Mr Choi Sung$-$beom, head of the Yongsan Fire Station, said in a briefing at the scene. Nineteen of the injured were in serious condition and receiving emergency treatment, the officials said, adding the death toll could rise.It was the first Halloween event in Seoul in three years after the country lifted Covid$-19$ restrictions and social distancing. Many of the partygoers were wearing masks and Halloween costumes. Some witnesses described the crowd becoming increasingly unruly and agitated as the evening deepened. The incident took place at about $10\mathrm{.}20$pm $(9\mathrm{.}20$pm Singapore time$).$

$$A number of people fell during a Halloween festival, and we have a large number of casualties,$$ Mr Choi said. Many of those killed were near a nightclub.

Adapted from guardian.com

$1.$ Review of the existing BCRM practices$/$regulations adopted by Company$/$Companies and Government Agencies. $($Hint: you can refer to newspaper articles and other information revealed by the investigation report to identify relevant BCRM practices$/$regulations

Marking rubric:

Provides a detailed explanation of at least $5$ practices with in$-$depth analysis

$2.$ Inferences $($look through the report findings after the results of the investigation and decipher what were the root cause$($s$)$ of the incident$)$

Marking Rubric:

Makes in$-$depth inferences for all relevant areas with detailed explanations.

Critical Thinking Framework and$/$or Root Cause Analysis is fully applied

$3.$ Recommendations to improve the event $($primarily from the perspective of the private sector owners and associations$).$

Marking Rubric:

Explains at least $5$ recommendations with comprehensive and practicable justification