need only conclusions

Thus, the technocratic model is three times more desirable than the democratic model of state management and government. Here, in our example, we recognize the authoritarian heritage in accepting the authority of experts. The key disadvantage of the technocratic model compared to the democratic is that professionals are given carte blanche confidence to make strategic decisions and the bulk of the population is excluded from the decision-making process. Technocracy is a kind of the minority educated professionals tyranny over the majority of less educated members of society. It should be noted that technocracy does not necessarily produce socially valuable results. It can be linked to any political or economic strength of society and defend its own interests, or simply take care about their own interests primarily. The point is that global politics should be left to the democratically elected government that will be able to articulate the interests of all stakeholders of civil society and ensure the protection of minority interests in the broadest sense of the word Experts should be left to perform the individual specific tasks that require professional competence and thereby achieve socially valuable effect. But it seems to be the much greater problem is that one in five respondents accept authoritarianism either in any form of government of a strong leader who is not limited by Parliament and elections or in the form of militaristic government. In the next step (Table 4) we crossed questions that show the attitude towards change and attitude that defines the optimal model of change. There is statistically significant relationship (p = 0.000) of low intensity between these two variables (Contingency coefficient C=0.23 and Cramer's V=0.13). Most frequently accepted combination is the one that connects the reformist view of social change with the technocratic model of governance. Concretely, 65.3% of the supporters of reform course accept technocratic model of governance as the best, or 56.4% of the supporters of technocracy accept the reform course. Another cell of the table which contains interesting results is one in which even 58.1% of the supporters of the democratic model of governance accept the reform course of changes. Of course, acceptance is not bidirectional, as only 21.4% of reformists accept democracy as the optimal model of governance. It is also interesting results in the row where intersects supporters of revolutionary change (radical cuts) given that more than half of supporters of radical change (56.4%) also preferred technocratic model of governance, while on the other hand, only about a quarter of supporters of technocracy accept the radical changes. It is interesting that 44.3% of supporters of the status quo accept the government of technocracy The table can be viewed either in vertical columns or in horizontal rows only. If we look at the vertical columns, we see that on the one hand one third of the supporters of the authoritarian model of governance advocating the radical course and in the other hand the next third advocating the reform course. It is observed that within this group it is twice more of those who oppose any change (16.2% of supporters of authoritarianism to 7.6% of supporters in the general population. It is observed that within this group, the share of those who oppose any change is twice bigger (16.2% of supporters of authoritarianism to 7.6% of supporters in the general population) Supporters of technocratic model are mainly directed towards the reform course (56.4%), while a quarter of them (23.6%) accept the radical cut. A third of the supporter of militaristic model of govemance prefer radical cuts (33.3%), a quarter of them prefer reform change (25.9%), while the same number of them are undecided. It is interesting that there are the most of those who do not have a clearly defined attitude toward the preferred dynamic of social change (25.9% compared to 14.9% of the total population) among the supporters of militarism. It seems that the militaristic attitude towards choosing a subject of change occurs as an expression of profound social hopelessness considering that a large number of supporters of this form of government either want quick, radical change or just do not know what would be good for the society, the state and the economy and they found force that can bring order in the society in the army It has already been noted that three fifths of the supporters of democratic government model accept technocrats. It should be added that one in five believes that social problems can be solved in the best way applying radical cuts. Analyzed by horizontal lines we observe that a technocracy is the modal choice of supporters of radical changes (56.4%). In addition to this, almost a quarter of them advocate an authoritarian model of governance. The presence of the acceptance of democracy and militarism in this group is significantly less Two-thirds of reformist oriented respondents accept the technocratic model of global management and government, while only one-fifth of them accept a democratic model. Other models of governance (authoritarianism and militarism) barely have supporters in this segment of the population Table 4: Cross tabulation: Who in your opinion should manage the state. Which of the following statements best describes your opinion: Who in your opinion should manage the state: Total Which of the following statements best describes your opinion: Astrong leader DAWLU OUM Due uoluples Experts who know best what is good for the state The government and the parliament elected in free elections 25.9% 100,0% The whole organization of our society must 23,5% 56,4% 4.4% 15,7% 100.0% be radically changed (in revolutionary 35,3% 23,6% 33.3% 20,6% action) 25,3% Our society must be completely changed 11.6% 65,3% 1.7% 21,4% 100.0% through a reform 36,0% 56.4% 58,1% 52,2% our present society must fight vigorously 36.1% 44.3% 6,6% 13.1% against any changes 16,2% 5.5% 14,8% 5,2% 7,6% 14,2% 59,2% 5.8% 20,8% 100,0% do not know 12,5% 14,5% 25,9% 16,1% 16,9% 60,5% 3,3% 19,2% 100,0% 0,0% 100,0% 100,09 100,0 7=42,946 C=0,23 V=0,13 p=0,000 14,9% Total 53 Slightly less than half of the opponents of social change (44.3%) accept technocratic model as the best model of governance, while more than a third of them (36.1%) support the authoritarian model of governance The distribution of those who declare not to know which the model of govemance would be optimal is almost identical as in the general population. The only visible difference is related to supporters of militaristic model which are almost twice more than in the total population (5.8%)