need some help with this question please

2. Crashing Projects. As we will study, it may be possible to shorten the duration of a project by "crashing" some project activities (i.e., completing them in a shorter amount of time, usually at additional cost). The premise behind a minimum cost schedule is that a project activity will be crashed (shortened) as long as the cost to do so is less than the money saved by shortening it (shortening a project can reduce indirect costs and penalty costs, for example). What if the net savings of shortening a project is $0 ? In other words, the indirect and/or penaity costs saved by shortening the project are equal to the additional direct costs to shorten project activities - that is, there is no net financial cost or savings incurred by shortening the project. Should they plan to crash (shorten) it? Provide your thoughts