Nevertheless, while the need for the study is articulated, the justification could have been stronger. A well-justified problem typically includes robust epidemiological or policy data that underscore the scope and urgency of the issue (Volkow & Boyle, 2018). The authors could have expanded their rationale by exploring organizational behavior theory, workplace wellness literature, or previous interventions in similar settings. Additionally, the study lacks specificity in operationalizing what constitutes a "public university employee," which may blur the boundaries of the target population and introduce variability in how workplace norms affect behavior. Furthermore, the study does not sufficiently establish the originality of the problem. Originality involves not only identifying gaps but also demonstrating how a new approach, perspective, or population can yield novel insights (Gertner, 2016). While surveying university staff is relatively uncommon in hygiene literature, the authors refrain from asserting how their findings might challenge prevailing assumptions, expand theoretical understanding, or inform policy innovations beyond the university context