Next, select one framework that you believe is the most appropriate for Chesapeake Innovations. To support your selection, create a comparison matrix or summary table that evaluates at least three of the above frameworks based on the following criteria: Industry fit and strategic alignment Coverage of key risks (e.g., emissions, labor, compliance) Ease of implementation (e.g., resources, complexity) Stakeholder recognition and global credibility Conclude this section by clearly justifying your chosen framework based on your analysis. Explain how it aligns with Chesapeake Innovations' sustainability priorities and organizational context. 4. SDG Alignment and Ethical Decision-Making (1 page) Identify at least two United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that the audit plan supports. Explain how the chosen framework and your audit priorities align with these SDGs. Connect this to ethical decision-making strategies from Unit 2.5. Preliminary Audit Planning (1 page) Develop a high-level outline for how Chesapeake Innovations could begin its sustainability audit. This is not a full implementation plan, but an early-stage planning document that highlights key priorities and design considerations to ensure the audit supports long-term sustainability and operational resilience. Your outline should address the following components: Audit Focus Areas: Based on Chesapeakes Vision 2030 goals, which core areas should the audit prioritize (e.g., environmental impact, labor practices, governance, emissions, supply chain practices)? Top 3 Performance Areas to Evaluate: Identify three specific ESG-related issues where Chesapeake should concentrate its assessment efforts. These should reflect the companys risk exposure, stakeholder expectations, or areas of strategic importance. Information Sources: Describe the types of data or information that may be gathered to support the audit (e.g., internal reports, supplier disclosures, utility usage, employee feedback). Key Roles or Departments: Identify the internal teams or departments likely to be involved in collecting data, overseeing the audit, and driving sustainability improvements. Scenario Planning and Business Continuity Considerations: Briefly explain how this audit could help Chesapeake prepare for future risks, such as regulatory shifts, supply chain disruptions, or environmental challenges. What types of what-if planning or resilience measures should be built into the audit? Communication Strategy: Propose one or two strategies Chesapeake could use to keep internal or external stakeholders informed throughout the audit process. Consider methods that support transparency, engagement, and alignment across global operations. 6. Conclusion and Recommendations ((1)/(2) page) Summarize key takeaways and suggest next steps to build Chesapeakes internal audit capacity.