no idea with this question

Xylon Processing Limited is a chemical manufacturer. Two chemicals, Aardyn and Gargaton, are produced from the common chemical xylon. The joint process requires 14,500 litres of xylon to be processed at a cost of $20,000 (including the cost of the chemical itself). From these 14,500 litres, the company produces 9,425 litres of Aardyn and 5,075 litres of Gargaton. The joint costs of $20,000 are allocated $13,000 to Aardyn and $7,000 to Gargaton. The company can sell the Aardyn and the Gargaton at the split-off point for $14,600 and $8,008, respectively. Alternatively, the company can process the Aardyn further to produce 9,425 litres of Anardyn. The Anardyn sells for $2.50 per litre and additional processing costs are $7,400. Should Xylon sell Aardyn, or should it process it further to produce Anardyn? Should Xylon sell Aardyn, or should it process it further to produce Anardyn? (Enter negative net benefits with parentheses or a minus sign. Round your answer to the nearest cent.) Xylon process the Aardyn further and turn it into Anardyn because the net benefit is $. should should not