Not every contract need be in writing. In fact, numerically speaking, the vast majority of contracts are oral. All the same, identify one correct reason why it is a good idea for contracts to be in writing even where there is no legal requirement for a written contract.

Question $5$Answer

a$.$

If there is no writing, there is a factual basis for the tort of nuisance.

b$.$

Writing means hand$-$written but not type$-$written.

c$.$

Written terms are a good idea because even well$-$intentioned persons can have honest disputes when recollecting the terms of an oral agreement.

d$.$

Writing is a good idea because when both or all parties to a contract write the document by hand, people will remember the terms more easily.

e$.$

Since there is no legal requirement for writing in all contracts, there is no advantage to having a written contract.

Clear my choice