Note: This question may have multiple correct answers. Incorrect answers will be penalized.

Tasha is the owner of a construction company. She has several workers who she employs on an "as needed" basis. She has made sure to obtain the necessary documentation for I-9 requirements for all of her workers. One of her field supervisors has informed her that a couple of the workers have California drivers licenses of the type that are given to undocumented workers. She asks the supervisor to obtain copies of the licenses for the files. Within 10 days of receiving copies of the licenses, Tasha informs her workers that she can no longer employ them because of their undocumented status. Does Tasha have a problem with having terminated the workers?

a. No, because the workers were employees at will.

b. Yes, because the workers had previously provided Tasha with documents that appeared on their face to be genuinely in compliance with the I-9 form.

c. No, because Tasha complied with California law by giving the workers warning before she cooperated with federal ICE agents and provided them with information about the workers undocumented status.

d. Perhaps, under federal law if Tasha's motivation was retaliatory and an unfair immigration practice because the workers could have other reasons for having that type of drivers license.