[Note: This question requires a reference in your bibliography] How did you divide the responsibilities within your group to complete the case study (by this, I mean this Group Case Study project in Business Professionalism) based on your correlation of personality and social styles assessment and the specific tasks that require completion? In detail, explain why particular tasks were assigned to specific team members. [10 marks] Question 2 Related to the case above, here are four (4) options for your team to consider: 1. Tracy and her team submit the assignment as is, knowing full well what's at risk if/when the professor identifies concerns relating to academic dishonesty. The group could be looking at a grade of 0 or worse ... 2. Tracy and her team "fire" Ricky from the Group Case Study, despite the professor's "ground rules" about working together and resolving differences no matter the situation. 3. Tracy and her team educate Ricky about what academic integrity entails and together. they work closely with Ricky to complete his section of the project in a way that upholds the principles of and policies on academic integrity. 4. Tracy and her team inform the professor about the breach of honesty/academic integrity as they believe it's up to the professor to determine next steps. Question 2.1 Which options would carry the best outcome for your student team (your group, not the characters in the case situation)? In your answer, contrast the pros and cons of each option. Explain in detail the rationale and process your group took to select a way forward. Consider the risk/reward and personality styles at plav, [15 marks]