Now calculate a different statistic: the ratio of conditional proportions of death between Gilbert and non-Gilbert...

  

Transcribed Image Text:

Now calculate a different statistic: the ratio of conditional proportions of death between Gilbert and non-Gilbert shifts. This ratio is called a relative risk. You should have gotten a value 6.336 for relative risk. Select all correct interpretations of this value, as the prosecution might present to a jury. Hint: There are exactly three that are correct! The risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was working is 6.336 times as high as the risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 633.6% higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 533.6% higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was working is 6.336 times higher than the risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 5.336 times higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 533.6% times as high as the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. Patient died during shift No patient died during shift Total Gilbert working on shift 40 217 257 Gilbert not working on shift 34 1350 1,384 Total 74 1,567 1,641 Now calculate a different statistic: the ratio of conditional proportions of death between Gilbert and non-Gilbert shifts. This ratio is called a relative risk. You should have gotten a value 6.336 for relative risk. Select all correct interpretations of this value, as the prosecution might present to a jury. Hint: There are exactly three that are correct! The risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was working is 6.336 times as high as the risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 633.6% higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 533.6% higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was working is 6.336 times higher than the risk of at least one patient dying on shifts where Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 5.336 times higher than the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. The proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was working is 533.6% times as high as the proportion of shifts where at least one patient died when Gilbert was not working. Patient died during shift No patient died during shift Total Gilbert working on shift 40 217 257 Gilbert not working on shift 34 1350 1,384 Total 74 1,567 1,641

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The detailed answer for the above question is provided below ANS WER ... View the full answer