Null Hypothesis There is no significant difference in productivity between employees who work remotely and those who work in the office.Alternative Hypothesis: Employees who work remotely are more productive than those who work in the office.

Null Hypothesis This assumes that the location of work (remote vs. office) does not affect productivity. It suggests there is no difference or no effect. Alternative Hypothesis This proposes that remote work leads to higher productivity compared to working in the office.

Explanation: testing the hypothesis: To test this, an analyst might gather productivity data from employees who have worked both remotely and in the office. They would then use statistical tests to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If the alternative hypothesis is supported by the data (i.e., remote workers are indeed more productive), this could influence business decisions, such as promoting more remote work options to potentially increase overall productivity.

respond to this