Often experts will make or break a case, especially when the expert supports a novel theory. Experts are witnesses but are allowed to give opinions. Their opinions are limited to only those areas for which the expert is qualified. Experts are not generally allowed to render conclusions based on the evidence directly, so their use is also limited. Experts are expensive so be certain to use them when necessary. The textbook describes what an expert is and how lawyers use experts to obtain evidence, evaluate cases, and prepare for trial. Describe the difference between an expert opinion and an expert conclusion. Give a hypothetical example of each. Which of your examples would be admissible as expert testimony? Justify your answers with examples and reasoning