Okay, here's question $24$:Question $24$Crompton Computers, Inc. $($Crompton$)$ is a computer developer and has developed a laptop that does not require to be plugged in$.$ The battery is charged by an alternator, similar to cranking the battery. Crompton is extremely proud, but once it tries to sell the laptop it developed, it receives a letter from attorneys for Hueypacker Hardware Co$.($Hueypacker$).$ The letter demonstrates conclusively that Crompton is infringing on Hueypacker's registered intellectual property, and the attorneys demand that Crompton immediately cease selling its laptop. Because Crompton has already completed so much work, it decides to continue selling the laptop. Hueypacker files suit. A court will likely rule that:$1.$ Crompton may sell the computer because it developed its laptop independently$\mathrm{.}2.$ Crompton may sell the computer because Hueypacker did not advertise its own laptop$\mathrm{.}3.$ Crompton must stop selling despite having created the product without knowing of Hueypacker's invention$\mathrm{.}4.$ Crompton must stop selling because of the adoption of moral rights$\mathrm{.}5.$ Crompton cannot sell its computer because its computer's design is infringing on Hueypacker's copyright.