On May $23,1957,$ police officers in Cleveland, Ohio, received information that a suspect in the bombing of Don King's home $($yes$,$ the famous Don King$),$ as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree $($or Doll Rae$)$ Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Ms$.$ Mapp refused to admit them without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Brandishing a piece of paper $($a fake warrant$),$ they broke in the door. Ms$.$ Mapp asked to see the "warrant" and took it from an officer, stuffing it down her dress. The officers struggled with Ms$.$ Mapp and took the fake warrant away from her. They handcuffed her for being "belligerent." The police searched the house thoroughly and discovered some pornography under a bed in the guest room. She was arrested.

Mapp v$.$ Ohio went all the way to the U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court and ended up as a landmark criminal procedure case. What was the rule that resulted from this case?

There was no rule that came out of the case, just a definition of flagrant abuse by the police.

Mapp's Rule

Rule Against Bad Evidence

Exclusionary Rule

QUESTION $40$

Under the express terms of title VII, a bona fide occupational qualification of race or color is permissible.

True

False