Only answer one question, either A or B. A principle is like a warrant: it is a general theory, proverb, standard, etc. that allows your reason to support the case (claim) you're making. The principles you use are not necessarily ethical theories. State any assumptions when making your points.

A. (Executive compensation) Sick Kids Foundation's president, Michael O'Mahoney, drew considerable public controversy over his salary and severance package. His salary was over $620,000 (U.S.) in some years, more than any other charity executive in Canada, and his severance package was $2.1-million. Explainsix distinctly different pointsto make the case that any future president's compensation at the foundation should be significantly lower, despite the growth experienced under his leadership. Make your case primarily based on first principles (such as those discussed by Moriarty) and explain your reasoning based on those principles before introducing facts from the news or elsewhere. Do not base your reasoning on comparisons with other charities or CEOs.

B. (Sustainable business) Tentree is an example of a clothing company that has aimed for specific sustainability-related goals and values. Explainsix distinctly different pointsto make the case that a clothing company should be environmentally sustainable. Make your case primarily based on first principles and explain your reasoning based on those principles before introducing facts from real life. The Tentree case is only provided as an example, and the use or analysis of case facts is not required to complete the above points.

For executive compensation:

Sick Kids' Foundation on the mend

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/sick-kids-foundation-on-the-mend/article4289526/

Six-figure salaries the norm at top charities

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/six-figure-salaries-the-norm-at-top-charities/article4352708/