P$.$ Whitney $,$ a West Virginia contractor $,$ was under contract with the state of West Virginia to construct State Route $2$ near East Steuben$-$ ville, just across the border from Steubenville $,$ Ohio $.$ Because the area was very hilly $,$ Whitney used high explosives $,$ such as dynamite and nitroglycerin $,$ to clear the way for the road. One particularly large blast damaged a store$-$ room of the Steubenville Plate and Window Glass Company, located across the border in Ohio. The damage was extensive $,$ and most of the stored glass was broken and rendered unusable $.$ Keeping in mind that the blasting was done in West Virginia and the damage occurred in Ohio, which state's law will govern the action brought in a West Virginia court by Steubenville Plate Glass against Whitney $?$ Dallas v$.$ Whitney, $118$ W$.$ Va$.106(1936)$