Paden signed an agreement dated May $28$ to purchase the Murrays$$ home. The Murrays accepted Paden$$s offer the following day, and the sale closed on June $27.$ Paden and his family moved into the home on July $14,1997.$ Paden had the home inspected prior to closing. The report listed four minor repairs needed by the home, the cost of which was less than $$500.$ Although these repairs had not been completed at the time of closing, Paden decided to go through with the purchase. After moving into the home, Paden discovered a number of allegedly new defects, including a wooden foundation, electrical problems, and bat infestation. The sales agreement allowed extensive rights to inspect the property. The agreement provided:

Buyer $...$ shall have the right to enter the property at Buyer$$s expense and at reasonable times $...$ to thoroughly inspect, examine, test, and survey the Property.... Buyer shall have the right to request that Seller repair defects in the Property by providing Seller within $12$ days from Binding Agreement Date with a copy of inspection report$($s$)$ and a written amendment to this agreement setting forth the defects in the report which Buyer requests to be repaired and$/$or replaced.... If Buyer does not timely present the written amendment and inspection report, Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted the Property $$as is$.$

Paden sued the Murrays for fraudulent concealment and breach of the sales agreement. If Mr$.$ Murray told Paden on May $26$ that the house had a concrete foundation, would this be fraud? Decide. $[$Paden v$.$ Murray, $523$ S$.$E$\mathrm{.}2$d $75($Ga$.$ App.$)]$