paraphrase text Based on the calculations performed on the two datasets from both countries, a lot of informed conclusions can be deduced. Both countries had little or no skew in the datasets, meaning the mean and median were relatively equal. Overall, based on the calculations, GBR had more rainy and mild weather than the USA. Thus, GBR's data set had a mean and median rainfall accumulation and temperatures that were higher than the USA's mean and median. The difference in rainfall accumulation can be attributed to the much higher rainfall received in GBR compared to the USA. Comparatively, the min rainfall accumulation between GBR and USA is only 7.98mm apart, which indicates that both countries had regions that received very little rainfall throughout the period being analyzed. From the calculations, it had a maximum rainfall accumulation of 147.96, more than that of the USA. This could be because the USA has more regions that receive less rainfall. USA's wider span in temperature appears to be happening quite on the high and low ends, indicating that USA has regions with more extreme weather than GBR. The data are collected from two countries from separate geographical locations and land sizes. Can these factors influence the data in any way? Thus, if both countries were in the same geographical area with the same land size, would we have seen any huge difference in the temperature and rainfall patterns? Taking these questions into consideration will help us draw a solid