Part $1$: The case against CSR from the "right" is that CSR asks too much of businesses and goes beyond their primary responsibility of making a profit. This view is often associated with Milton Friedman, who argued that the only social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits. This view suggests that businesses should not be expected to consider the social or environmental impacts of their actions, as long as they are operating within the law.

Part $2$: The case for CSR is that it is not only socially responsible, but also good for business. This view suggests that businesses have a responsibility to consider the social and environmental impacts of their actions, and that by doing so$,$ they can create long$-$term value for their stakeholders, including employees, customers, and shareholders. This view is often found in business ethics textbooks, which argue that businesses can benefit from adopting CSR practices by improving their reputation, attracting and retaining talented employees, and increasing customer loyalty.

Part $3$: The case against CSR from the "left" is that it does not go far enough and does not work well. This view suggests that CSR is often used as a way for businesses to deflect criticism and avoid taking more radical action to address social and environmental issues. Critics argue that CSR initiatives can be superficial and do not necessarily address the root causes of social and environmental problems. Some also argue that CSR can be used as a way for businesses to maintain the status quo and avoid more significant changes that would challenge their power and profitability.

Part $4$: Personally, I believe that the correct view is somewhere in between the "right" and "left" perspectives on CSR$.$ While I agree with the "right" that businesses should not be expected to solve all of society's problems, I also believe that they have a responsibility to consider the social and environmental impacts of their actions and to strive to be good corporate citizens. At the same time, I agree with the "left" that CSR cannot be a substitute for more significant action to address social and environmental issues. Instead, businesses should be held accountable for the full range of their impacts and should be required to take action to address any negative consequences of their actions.