Question: PART 2: Hypothesis Testing for TWO mean An assistant principal at Hastings stated that students at Hastings type faster than the students at Elsik. To
PART 2: Hypothesis Testing for TWO mean
An assistant principal at Hastings stated that students at Hastings type faster than the students at Elsik. To test this theory, an Elsik student collects a random sample of 36 Elsik students and 32 Hastings students and records their typing speeds.
Elsik:
Sample Mean = 35
Sample Standard Deviation = 11.6
Hastings:
Sample Mean = 38.5
Sample Standard Deviation = 13.6
Is there convincing evidence at the alpha = 0.05 level that, on average, Hastings students type faster than Elsik students?
Random -The random condition is not required in this scenario.
Only Elsik was a random sample.
Stated to be random samples of both Elsik and Hastings.
Not stated that either group is a random sample.
10% -You do not do the 10% condition for two means.
We assume 36 and 32 students is less than 10% of all Elsik and all Hastings Students
We cannot assume the 10% condition is met.
Large Sample -This condition is not met since the sample sizes are different.
Only Elsik is a large enough sample.
Yes, both 36 and 32 > 30 so they are both large enough samples.
Since all conditionHAVE
HAVE NOT
been met, we will conduct a
Test Statistic -0.1305
1.1345
2.4586
0.2610
-1.1345
0.8695
0.0135
P-Value -0.1305
1.1345
2.4586
0.2610
-1.1345
0.8695
0.0135
CONCLUDE
Since our p-value isLESS
GREATER
than our alpha, weREJECT
DO NOT REJECT
Ho. ThereIS
IS NOT
convincing evidence thatOn average, Hastings students type faster than Elsik students.
Hastings is better than Elsik
On average, Hastings students are better writers than Elsik students
.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
