Part $4$: Assume John would be making a non$-$programmed decision sometime during his efforts to change the DM process. Explain how the C$-$Level DM process could be changed by applying $2-3$ steps of the following Steps $3,5,$ and $7$ of the decision making $($DM$)$ process. $($LO $2\mathrm{.}5)$

Step $1$: Recognizing that a decision $($or change$)$ needs to be made. You already answered this Step in Part $1$ where your explanations refer to why Elizabeth said the DM process needs to be changed. $($This is a good way to start the assignment and decision$-$making process. Thus, no need to repeat your answer to Part $1.)$

Step $3$: Analyzing Alternatives $($done after Step $2$: Generating multiple alternatives$).$ Explain how John could utilize $1-2$ of the tactics listed for Step $3($pgs$.38-42)$ to assess the quality of different ways to change the DM process: engaging in evidence$-$based DM$,$ thinking critically, talking to other people, and considering long$-$term implications. $($Do not address ethical implications.$)$

Step $5$: Implementing the selected alternative $($done after Step $4$Selecting the alternative$).$ Explain how and when John $($& Jane$)$ could introduce the new DM process to the C$-$Level managers.

Step $7$: Evaluating the effectiveness of the decision. Explain $2-3$ ways John and C$-$Level managers $($including Jane$)$ could determine if the new DM process is better and$/$or if it needs to be revised.