Part A $1.$Select one $(1)$ real construction$-$related dispute from either court or arbitration records, and provide a comprehensive response to the following tasks, demonstrating your ability to analyse legal and engineering aspects of the case critically. a$)$Present a concise and original dispute summary, including facts, project timeline, and involved parties. Avoid copying from the judgment and transcript. b$)$Evaluate the engineering decisions, documentation, or project management practices that could have prevented the dispute c$)$Assess whether any party $($engineer$,$ consultant, contractor, etc.$)$ failed to uphold their professional duty of care, leading to the dispute d$)$Identify specific acts or omissions and relate them to legal elements: duty of care, breach, and resulting damage Part B: Expert Witness Interview & Insight $2.$ Conduct and analyse an interview with a professional who served as an expert witness in an engineering$-$related dispute, either in court or arbitration. The expert witness you interviewed must have been directly involved in the same legal dispute case you analysed in Part A$.$ This ensures continuity between your legal analysis and professional insights. Attach a transcript or detailed summary of your interview as an appendix. $($a$)$Present a summary of the expert$$s profile covering name, qualifications, years of experience, area of expertise, the case background, their responsibilities in the dispute, and courtroom or arbitration experience. b$.)$Based on your interview, evaluate how the expert$$s evidence influenced case resolution. The evidence should include their credibility, impact, and whether their role was technical or advisory. c$)$ Assess ethical challenges or limitations the expert faced during proceedings. part C: Expert Witness Interview & Insight a$)$Based on Parts A and B$,$ explain on the most surprising insight gained from the expert and how it has reshaped your understanding of an engineer$$s role in legal disputes b$)$Based on your case and expert interview findings, recommend two $(2)$ realistic, actionable strategies to improve legal awareness, contract administration, or forensic engineering practices in the construction industry.