Part I: Critical Thinking: What Would You Do? Case Assignment AMERICAN EXPRESS New York, NY Headquarters New York, New York with medical costs rising 10 to 15 percent per year, one of the members of your Board of Directors mentioned that some companies are refusing to hire smokers and that the board should discuss this option at the next month's meeting. Nationwide, about 6,000 companies refuse to hire smokers, Weye, anchployee benefits company in Okemos, Michigan, requires all applicants to take a nicotine test. Weyco's CFO says. "We're not saying people can't smoke. We're just saying they can't make and work here. As an employee benefits company, we need to take a leadership role in helping people understand the cost impact of smoking The Cleveland Clinic, one of the top hoals in the United States doesn't hire smokers, Paul Terpeluk, the director of corporate and employee health, says that all applicants are tested for nicotine and that 250 people have lost job opportunities because they smoke. The Massachusetts Hospital Association also refuses to hire smokers. The company's CEOs Smoking is a personal choice, and as an employer I have a personal choice within the law about who we hire and who we don't As indicated by your board member costs are driving the trend not to hire smokers. According to the US. Centers for Disease Control, a smoker costs about $4.000 more a year to employ because of increased health care costs and lost productivity. Breaking that down, a smoker will have 50 percent higher absenteeism, and, when present will work 39 fewer minutes per day because of smoke breaks, which leads to 1.817 lost hours of annual productivity. Asmoker will have higher accident rates Cause S1.000 a year in property damage from cigarette burns and smoke damage and will cost up to $5,000 more a year for annual insurance premium John Banchar executive director of an antismoking group in Washington, and a law professor at George Washington University says. "Smoking is the biggest factor in controllable healthcare costs. Although few would disagree about the costs, others argue it is wrong not to hire smokers. Jay Whichead.publisher of a magazine for human resources manapsays. "There is discrimination at many companies and maybe even most companies against people who smoke. Even if applicants aren't asked whether they make it doesn't mean that hiring managers turn off their sense of smell. Paul Share a smoker who was fired less than a week after taking a new job, says "Not hiring smokers affects millions of people and put them in the same category as women we to her children that is people who contribute to higher health-care costs. It's unfair Law professor Don Gamer believes that nothing smokers is "an overreaction on the part of employers whose crestis cutting costs. If someone has the ability to do the job, he should get it. What you do in your home is your own business. ... Net hiring smokers is respiratory apartheid Well, with the meeting just a month way, you've got to prepare for the Board of Directors questions. For cumple, on what basis should the company decide whether to hire smokers? Should the decision be based on what is the best interest of the firm, what the law allows, or what affirms and respects individual rights? The Board is interested in making good decisions for the company, but doing the right thing is also one of its core values. Next, is this an issue of ethics of social responsibility? Ethical decision making is conced with doing right and avoiding wrong, whereas social responsability is a business's obligation to pursue policies, make decisions, and take actions that benefit society. Finally, given that it so much cheaper not to hire smokers, the board will want to know whether refusing to hire smokers is a form of discrimination If you were in charge at American Express, what would you do