Question: PARY Vanswer ALL 25. Case 5: The complaining party worked as a production employee for a bedding manufacturer amplying me and part-time employees including the
PARY Vanswer ALL 25. Case 5: The complaining party worked as a production employee for a bedding manufacturer amplying me and part-time employees including the owner's daughter), located in Meridiari Ms. She stated that her acting immediate supervisor physically attacked her on the occasions during two day period. On Tory 10, 2001 while she was wone with her supervisor in a mind foortorage room. her superior grabbed the complaining party around her shoulders and photowa im. When complained about his actions, he told her. Things don't go right at the time. Air the supervisor made this statement the complaining party na able to break www walked on down the stairs. The supervisor made no further attempt to restrain her during his particular incident However, another incident occurred two days later when the two happened to be alone in the Morage room again. This time, the supervisor grabbed the coming party by her arm and squeezed it telling her that he wanted to squeeze her body When she refused and insisted that he leave her wone me supervisor the grabbed her wound het shoulders and neck with both of his arms, but she managed to break away and hurried to the stairs. As she was walking to the air the supervisor to the back of a neck and put his arm around the front of her neck placing her in a neck lock. Again, she broke away and told him no and to leave her thone. On September 22, 2021, Ting an Intemal complaint the complaining party resigned from her employment and went directly to the EEOG a. Can the CP establish a Title VII violation here? Why? (4 points) b. To what type of finility will the employer be held? (3points) For the toolbar, press ALT 10 PC) O ALT-FN-F10M QUESTION 25 PART V answer ALL 25. Case 5: The complaining party worked as a production employee for a bedding manufacturer, employing 6 full-t daughter), located in Meridian, MS. She stated that her acting immediate supervisor physically attacked her on two OCCH while she was alone with her supervisor in a third-floor storage room, her supervisor grabbed the complaining party arou complained about his actions, he told her, "Things don't go right all the time. After the supervisor made this statement, th on down the stairs. The supervisor made no further attempt to restrain her during this particular incident. However, another incident occurred two days later when the two happened to be alone in the storage room again. This arm and squeezed it, telling her that he wanted to squeeze her body. When she refused and insisted that he leave shoulders and neck with both of his arms, but she managed to break away and hurried to the stairs. As she was walking and put his arm around the front of her neck placing her in a neck lock. Again, she broke away and told him no and to internal complaint, the complaining party resigned from her employment and went directly to the EEOC. a. Can the CP establish a Title VII violation here? Why? (4 points) b. To what type of liability will the employer be held? (3points) For the toolbar, press ALT+F10 (PC) or ALT+FN+F10 (Mac). Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers