Peer evaluation guidelines:

1. Please download and read the work submitted your peers, attached above.
2. Review the checklists below. Please use MS Word or Adobe Acrobat to add comments.
   1. If you can answer "yes" to each of the checklist questions below, that's great. You can note some general comments about what you liked/did not like (with suggestions to improve) about the team's work.
   2. If you answer "no" to any of the questions below, please make some targeted suggestions for improvement.
3. Save the team's file, with your comments, and upload it using the submission tools, below.

Peer evaluation checklist for reports:

Content:

• Does the report:
  • show/describe the tool?
  • outline user benefits?
  • outline organizational benefits?
  • explain cost implications?
  • identify risks?
  • make recommendations?
• Is the report organized logically?

Format:

• Is the report correctly formatted as a memo?
• Does it have a concise, specific subject line?
• Does it use headings and page design elements for easy readability/navigation?
• Do images and figures contribute to the content of the report?
• Are images and figures correctly numbered and titled?

Style:

• Is the report clear and concise? (If not, please identify for the team which sections you found confusing.)
• Does the report look and sound professional?

Mechanics:

• Is the spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. perfect?

Documentation:

• Are sources for information and images correctly cited in APA , both in-text and in a references list?

Peer evaluation checklist for infographics:

• Is the information useful and relevant?
• Is it clear where to begin reading the infographic and how to move through the reading flow?
• Is the information presented in a logical sequence?
• Is the page design clear, appealing, and uncluttered?
• Is the text concise and specific?
• Are the sources for information and images cited somewhere on the infographic?
• Is the spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. perfect?