please answer #4 and show work

Case Write-Up Instructions and Questions Show all of your work. If you are making an assumption, state and briefly explain the reason for the assumption. That can help me follow your approach. Take your time and provide a clear layout for each answer. Upload your case write-up as a Word document with a .docx extension. Answer the following questions. 1. (60 points) Calculate breakeven in individual units (not cases) for Good Foods, Inc. in 2020. Be sure to show each step in the breakeven calculation. 2. (15 points) What is the breakeven in dollars? 3. (25 points) What market share will Good Foods, Inc. need in order to breakeven in 2020? 4. (15 bonus points) Calculate breakeven with a 5% return on sales. Protest Type 1. Irons 2. Coffeemakers 3. Toasters 4 Blenders 5. Can Openers 6. Mixers 7 Frypans 3. Broen 9. Corpus 10. Slicing Knives TABLET Kitchen Electries Sales Patterns and Projections (individual units) 2018 2010 2020 estimated 9.915,000 9,475,000 9,000,000 3.200.000 8.500,000 5.800.000 6,200,000 8.800,000 6,600,000 4.900.000 6.100,000 5.900.000 5.100.000 5,500,000 3,800,000 4.560,000 4,000,000 5,100,000 2.975,000 3.100.000 3.500,000 2,640,000 2,500,000 1,850,000 2.200,000 2.600,000 2.500,000 2,100,000 2,000,000 2.770,000 TABLE II GOOD FOODS, INC.: "Introduction of Electrical Appliances Good Foods, Inc, primarily a food manufacturer, was considering a long-range plan to undertake the manufacturing and marketing of small electrical appliances Product Lines Good Foods marketed a wide range of food products. Among the best known were the "Ann Anderson line of cake frosting, and brownie mixes. Good Foods also marketed a number of cereals, four products, frozen and refrigerated food. The name "Ann Anderson was one of Good Foods primes Dt had been carefully cultivated with over twenty million dollars having been spent to put the same across to the public Small Appliance Project in 2016 a special project was started in which a group of engineers developed prototypes of various electrical appliances. Four products, a toaster, electric trying pan, iron and coffeemaker were developed. Several converests of these four appliances had been conducted throughout the product development process. All for appliances compared favorably with competitors during home use tests. These tests were conducted with appliance owners droghout the United States. While the new appliances were not major breakthroughs in design, they did incorporate the most op to-date features that characterize competitive appliances. All of Good Foods' home-use testi were conducted in the appliance owner was not told who manufactured the appliance The competition in the appliance busiest was characterized as intense with many firm sharing the market. Several large manufactures wichs General Electric Sunbeam, Toast Master and others were well established in the traditional appliances distribution channels (appliance outlets approximately during the past ten years Title indicates the patter of sales for the last few yean by product type Good Foodi esecutives comidered a 10% penetration of this market potential arealpowibility Good Foods, Ine decided to competely price the new line without lading well in the field The average unitselling price was determined to be us. In other words, con would pw 54% to purchase any of the new appliances at their local supermarket. This pricing policy allowed a mark up on the retail selling price for the supermarket. This markup represented a substantially higher in the supermarkets receive item och cereal canned foods, ed. Good Food Inc.'nit costs are about the same for all four products Management expected this margin to be a major incentive for the market to handle the new appliance Because Ann Anders was sich a well-established brand name, only moderate advertising was planned for the new line. It was argued that homemakers vont supermarkets at least once a week and that they saturally will notice the appliance display. An advertising bodget of 55 million year was proposed for the first few years of new product introduction product manager from the cerealision was chosen to handle the marketing of the new line (Cost data for the project e given in Table II) Cost Case 5720 Con Data Variable Carte Transportaties Broken Gode Warehousing Parts and Materials Packaging Labor and Overhead Fed Costa BMg Mach. & Equip Start Up Costs Mante) Or Experiental 2.00 66.00 6.20 39,850,000 1.900,000 300,000 100,000 Six units were packaged in ce cas. For examplt, six coffeemakers are to be shipped in ORCH To be depreciated over 10 year-standard accounting practice These cos represented the costs to develop the prototypes. contact.com and other continued in the new product development process