please answer b, c,d,e

and question 4

b) Describe the ethical risks associated with offshore purchasing in this situation. c) Based on the strategic importance of outsourcing/offshore suppliers, which Supplier Interaction Model best describes the relationship that exists between Ryding-Regency Meat Packers Ltd. and the Wisconsin DOC. d) What should it be? e) Why? (5 x 2 = 10 points) 4. Identify and explain the processing stages that Ryding-Regency Meat Packers Ltd. might have followed in conducting the recall. (10 points) X Launch Meeting - Zoom > Home IT Conestoga College stoga desire2leam.com/d21/1e/content/456326/viewContent/9644484/View tomise Links - Free Hotmail : Windows Media Imported From IE Kouse Wise wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Global Value Chain (7th ed.). FITT", and the readings listed in appendices A, B and C. Students are expected to augment their knowledge of the relevant issues in this Term Project by researching generally available, online resource material, as necessary. Grading Rubric: See page 7 Project Description: On October 8, 2019 the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) published details of a recall announced October 4" by Ryding-Regency Meat Packers Ltd. in Toronto, Ontario Canada of raw beef products from the marketplace due to possible E coli O157:H7 contamination. The majority of contaminated products were shipped to locations across Canada, and the company advised consumers not to eat the affected products, However, earlier in the year. Ryding-Regency had signed a contract with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC) in Madison, Wisconsin USA to supply boneless beef chuck 85 (product #9022000) to five correctional facilities in the state. The most recent shipment of beef products, packed on May 27 2019, shipped from Ryding-Regency in Toronto to the five Wisconsin correctional facilities, was included in the recall OPER8340 S21 Term Project Donost: 2 13 D One 26C AQI61 CONESTOGA Comenusersions Since the shipment involved an interational destination and consumers who were incarcerated senior management at Ryding-Regency could not verify that the DOC would comply with the meat recall and were concerned about potential liability. As a result, the senior management team asked Iarrangements to have the contaminated products picked up from the five correctional facilities and returned to Canada for verification and disposal, The five correctional facilities involved are 1. Racine Correctional Institution capacity 1.798 inmates 2019 Wisconsin St. Sturtevant, WI 53177-1829 https.Ideo. w.gov/Pages Offenderinformation Adultinatitutions.BagineContectionallestitution.aspx 2. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility (capacity 1.040 inmates) 1015 N. 10th St. Milwaukee, WI 53205-0740 https:ideo. w.gov/Pages/Offenderinformation Adultinstitutions MilwaukeeSecureDetention Facility aspx 3. New Lisbon Correctional Institution (capacity 1.010 inmates) 2000 Progress Road, New Lisbon. W 63960-2000 https:deo wi.gov/Pages/Offende information/Adultinstitutions. NewLisbon Correctionalinstitution aspx - Jacksor Correctional Institution capacity 933 inmates NB600 Haipek Road Black River Falls, WI 54815-0232 httpsdoe. w.gow Pages Offende information Aculintitutions Eckson Correctionalinstitutions 5 Rice outhful rende-Correctione Facility capacity 927 nmates *50140 St Racing W 53400.000 httpsdogov Pages Offende Information Adult Stona Racine Youthache correctionala