Please answer case questions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.7 tate laws tobacco do so? At the same time,
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Please answer case questions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.7
Transcribed Image Text:
tate laws tobacco do so? At the same time, Congress also approved the Chil dren's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). In brief, CIPA conditions the receipt of federal funds under the E-Rate program and the LSTA on libraries' purchase and installation of software that blocks obscene or porno- graphic material. A group of libraries and private citi- zens filed suit, claiming that connecting LSTA grant funds to CIPA compliance is unconstitutional. CASE QUESTIONS 1. Is the condition requiring the purchase and instal lation of blocking software in order to qualify for discounts and grants constitutional? 2. Is the First Amendment at issue in this case? Explain your answer. 3. What regulations or restrictions, if any, may Con gress impose on Internet communications? CASE SUMMARY 2.7 State Farm Mutual v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) DUE PROCESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES Curtis Campbell was involved in a car accident in which one person was killed and another permanently disabled. State Farm, Campbell's insurer, investigated the accident and concluded that Campbell was negli- gent (i.e., at fault for the accident) but refused to settle a case brought by the injured parties for Campbell's $50,000 policy limit. Prior to trial, State Farm falsely told Campbell that (1) he was not liable in the case brought against him by the injured parties and (2) State Farm and Campbell's mutual interests were closely aligned, so hiring his own attorney was unnecessary. Based on State Farm's assurances, Campbell did not consult his own attorney. At trial, a jury found against both Campbell and State Farm. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $185,849, far more than the amount requested during pretrial settlement discussions. State Farm refused to pay any amount beyond the $50,000 policy limit, and its general counsel advised Campbell to sell his house to cover the excess award owed to the plaintiffs. Campbell then sued State Farm for bad faith, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury found for Campbell, awarding him $2.6 mil- lion in compensatory damages, to compensate him for his actual losses, and $145 million in punitive damages. Consistent with a state statute limiting certain damage awards, the trial court reduced the awards to $1 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages. An appellate court later reinstated the origi- nal $145 million punitive-damage award on the basis that the state's punitive-damage statute allowed larger damage awards if the defendant acted in a particularly reprehensible manner. State Farm appealed. CASE QUESTIONS 1. When State Farm appealed the jury's punitive- damage award, it argued that such a disproportion- ately large punitive-damage award ($145 million) was a violation of the Due Process Clause. Do you agree or disagree? 2. The Due Process Clause, like all the protections in the Bill of Rights, is meant to apply to government agents, not to private parties. Should a civil jury be considered a government actor or a private actor under the Due Process Clause? 3. How can one determine what constitutes an excessive award of damages that violates a defendant's right to due process, compared to one that does not violate the Due Process Clause? Is this distinction clear? CASE SUMMARY 2.8 Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale, 492 F.3d 766 (6th Cir. 2007) tate laws tobacco do so? At the same time, Congress also approved the Chil dren's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). In brief, CIPA conditions the receipt of federal funds under the E-Rate program and the LSTA on libraries' purchase and installation of software that blocks obscene or porno- graphic material. A group of libraries and private citi- zens filed suit, claiming that connecting LSTA grant funds to CIPA compliance is unconstitutional. CASE QUESTIONS 1. Is the condition requiring the purchase and instal lation of blocking software in order to qualify for discounts and grants constitutional? 2. Is the First Amendment at issue in this case? Explain your answer. 3. What regulations or restrictions, if any, may Con gress impose on Internet communications? CASE SUMMARY 2.7 State Farm Mutual v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) DUE PROCESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES Curtis Campbell was involved in a car accident in which one person was killed and another permanently disabled. State Farm, Campbell's insurer, investigated the accident and concluded that Campbell was negli- gent (i.e., at fault for the accident) but refused to settle a case brought by the injured parties for Campbell's $50,000 policy limit. Prior to trial, State Farm falsely told Campbell that (1) he was not liable in the case brought against him by the injured parties and (2) State Farm and Campbell's mutual interests were closely aligned, so hiring his own attorney was unnecessary. Based on State Farm's assurances, Campbell did not consult his own attorney. At trial, a jury found against both Campbell and State Farm. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $185,849, far more than the amount requested during pretrial settlement discussions. State Farm refused to pay any amount beyond the $50,000 policy limit, and its general counsel advised Campbell to sell his house to cover the excess award owed to the plaintiffs. Campbell then sued State Farm for bad faith, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury found for Campbell, awarding him $2.6 mil- lion in compensatory damages, to compensate him for his actual losses, and $145 million in punitive damages. Consistent with a state statute limiting certain damage awards, the trial court reduced the awards to $1 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages. An appellate court later reinstated the origi- nal $145 million punitive-damage award on the basis that the state's punitive-damage statute allowed larger damage awards if the defendant acted in a particularly reprehensible manner. State Farm appealed. CASE QUESTIONS 1. When State Farm appealed the jury's punitive- damage award, it argued that such a disproportion- ately large punitive-damage award ($145 million) was a violation of the Due Process Clause. Do you agree or disagree? 2. The Due Process Clause, like all the protections in the Bill of Rights, is meant to apply to government agents, not to private parties. Should a civil jury be considered a government actor or a private actor under the Due Process Clause? 3. How can one determine what constitutes an excessive award of damages that violates a defendant's right to due process, compared to one that does not violate the Due Process Clause? Is this distinction clear? CASE SUMMARY 2.8 Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale, 492 F.3d 766 (6th Cir. 2007)
Expert Answer:
Related Book For
The Legal Environment Of Business A Managerial Approach Theory To Practice
ISBN: 9781260247800
4th Edition
Authors: Sean Melvin, Enrique Guerra-Pujol
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
In an effort to increase Internet access for the public Congress enacted legislation to create the E-Rate program, which provides discounted Internet rates, as well as the Library Services and...
-
You have just been given a $454,000, which you decide to invest at an APR of 6.7 percent. If you were to withdraw $38,500 at the end of each year, starting at the end of this year, how many years...
-
Draw a tree diagram that pictures all possible equally likely outcomes if a coin is flipped as specified. a. Two times b. Three times c. Four times
-
Dora Alexander, owner of Passions Linen Shop, was preparing checks for payment of the current month's purchase invoices when she realized that there were two invoices from Sensuous Linen Company,...
-
The filament of a \(100 \mathrm{~W}(120 \mathrm{~V})\) lightbulb is a tungsten wire \(0.035 \mathrm{~mm}\) in diameter. At the filament's operating temperature, the resistivity is \(5.0 \times...
-
Referring to Exercise 1: A study of 86 savings and loan associations in six northwestern states yielded the following cost function: Where C = average operating expense ratio, expressed as a...
-
A Prolog program session appears as follows: ?- parent(A,B). A = salah B = saeed; A = hussain B = salah; A = hoda B = saeed; ?-grandfather(A,B). A = hussain B = saeed; ?-grandparent(A,B). A = Hussain...
-
Explain why a passively managed fund guarantees the average return of the individual securities in that fund, but it cannot ever outperform the return of the index it tracks. What is one advantage...
-
What are three methods that can be used to disseminate research insights throughout an organization?
-
What is the primary use of A/B testing? What advantages and disadvantages does this test have?
-
What is a questionnaire, and what functions does it serve?
-
Nabisco has introduced a new brand of cookies and wants to know how many of their customers purchase their cookies more than once. What type of research should they use?
-
What is research design?
-
Select four out of the 14 factors that affect Quality listed in the table. For each of the four factors selected, describe in one paragraph each, what is your understanding as it pertains to the...
-
The maximum pressure that can be developed for a certain fluid power cylinder is 15.0 MPa. Compute the required diameter for the piston if the cylinder must exert a force of 30 kN.
-
Show that the definition of the iterated It integral for \(f \in L^{2}\left(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{2} ight)\) (Definition 20.9) is independent of the approximating sequence. Data From 20.9 Definition 20.9...
-
Prove (20.20), i.e. show that \(\mathbb{E}\left[B_{T}^{2 n} e^{-B_{T}^{2}} ight]=\frac{(2 n-1) ! !}{\sqrt{2 T+1}}\left(\frac{T}{2 T+1} ight)^{n}\). Here, \((-1) ! !:=1\), \((2 n-1) ! !=1 \cdot 3...
-
Verify the claim made in Example 21.9 using Its formula. Derive from the proof of Lemma 21.8 explicitly the form of the transformation and the coefficients in Example 21.9. Integrate the condition...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App