Question: Levy and Kaplan argue that CSR initiatives are assuming global governance functions, but that these initiatives represent a contested terrain. On the one hand, they
Levy and Kaplan argue that CSR initiatives are assuming global governance functions, but that these initiatives represent a “contested terrain.” On the one hand, they seem to offer new possibilities for democratic problem-solving and enhanced corporate accountability; on the other hand, these new CSR initiatives may threaten to bring about a privatization of governance. What is meant by “privatization” of regulatory authority here? Explain, giving examples from real life organisations.
Step by Step Solution
3.32 Rating (164 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
The privatization of regulatory authority as referred to in the question is the transfer of reg... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
