Question: Levy and Kaplan argue that CSR initiatives are assuming global governance functions, but that these initiatives represent a contested terrain. On the one hand, they

Levy and Kaplan argue that CSR initiatives are assuming global governance functions, but that these initiatives represent a “contested terrain.” On the one hand, they seem to offer new possibilities for democratic problem-solving and enhanced corporate accountability; on the other hand, these new CSR initiatives may threaten to bring about a privatization of governance. What is meant by “privatization” of regulatory authority here? Explain, giving examples from real life organisations.

Step by Step Solution

3.32 Rating (164 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The privatization of regulatory authority as referred to in the question is the transfer of reg... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!