please answer the following:

Case $6\mathrm{.}1$: Burkey v$.$ Marshall County Board of Edu$$cation

$513$ F$.$ Supp. $1084($N$.$D$.$ W$.$Va$.1981)$

How might you amend the policies of the defendant school district regarding boys$$ and girls$$ athletic programs in order to comply with the law?

As a school administrator, how might you legally proceed in determining whether a woman is qualified to coach boys$$ athletics?

What would you consider as an appropriate remedy in this case? Why?

Case $6\mathrm{.}3$: Moore v$.$ University of Notre Dame $22$ F$.$ Supp. $2$d $896($N$.$D$.$ Ind. $1998)$

What are considered appropriate remedies for violations of the ADEA?

When is reinstatement an appropriate remedy? Why was it not appropriate in this case?

Describe strategies for how you could mitigate risk of violating the ADEA while still maintaining appropriate strengths in an athletic department

Case $6\mathrm{.}4$: Perdue v$.$ City University of New York $13$ F$.$ Supp. $2$d $326($E$.$D$.$ N$.$Y$.1998)$

What constitutes a violation of the Equal Pay Act?

What did the plaintiff have to show in order to prove a violation of the Equal Pay Act?

Under the Equal Pay Act, what is an appropriate remedy?

Case $7\mathrm{.}1$: Blair v$.$ Washington State University $740$ P$\mathrm{.}2$d $1379($Wash$.1987)$

In the opinion of the state Supreme Court, should football be excluded from the determination of whether sex equity exists?

In the opinion of the court, should it be required that revenues from football be used to fund women$$s athletic programs? Why? What is your opinion? $($support with at least one outside source$)$

Case $8\mathrm{.}2$: Favia v$.$ Indiana University of Pennsylvania

$812$ F$.$ Supp. $578($W$.$D$.$ Pa$.1993)$

By what amount was the athletic department required to reduce its budget in $1991?$

What was the percentage difference in female athletes before and after the budget cuts?

What evidence was cited for justifying the elimination of women$$s gymnastics and field hockey as varsity sports?

Why did the court hold that the requirements of the first prong of the three$-$prong test had not been met?

Why did the court hold that the requirements of the second prong of the three$-$prong test had not been met?

Why did the court hold that the requirements of the third prong of the three$-$prong test had not been met?

Case $8\mathrm{.}6$: Kelley v$.$ Board of Trustees $35$ F$\mathrm{.}3$d $265(7$th Cir. $1994)$

If the percentage of female$/$male student athletes is substantially proportionate to the female$/$male student ratio, is there a presumption that athletic interests have been accommodated? Explain.

Do the policy interpretations mandate statistical balancing? Explain.

Are parallel teams required? Why?

Case $10\mathrm{.}1$: Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v$.$ National Collegiate Athletic Association $735$ F$\mathrm{.}2$d $577($D$.$C$.$ Cir. $1984)$

What do the first three sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act provide?

What evidence did the plaintiff put forth in an attempt to prove that the disputed use of monopoly power by the NCAA was unlawful and caused economic injury? What was the response of the court?

What is $$attempted monopolization,$$ and why was it important to this case?

Case $12\mathrm{.}2$: Concerned Parents to Save Dreher Park Center v$.$ City of West Palm Beach $846$ F$.$ Supp. $986($S$.$D$.$ Fla. $1994)$

In the court$$s opinion, what injury would participants endure if the defendant$$s programs were eliminated?

If the city had eliminated all recreation programs, would the plaintiffs have had a case? Why or why not?